MOT Today. Found something out

Discussion in 'General 1000RR Discussion' started by BoroRich, Feb 13, 2014.

  1. BoroRich

    BoroRich Elite Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2012
    Messages:
    3,274
    Likes Received:
    1,601
    Prior to heading to the testing centre I'd been monkeying around with the bike and put the rear seat back on instead of the cowl.

    The tester informed me that because I had the rear seat on and had de-pegged the bike that should be an MOT fail. He ignored it and just said that he'd put down that it didn't have one :D

    Apparently you can have a rear seat and rear pegs. A cowl and pegs. A cowl and no pegs but you can't have a seat and no pegs.
     
  2. fez.57

    fez.57 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2011
    Messages:
    3,115
    Likes Received:
    876
    Thats stupid. Just like headlight covers being illegal but track bikes being allowed a daytime m.o.t
     
  3. BoroRich

    BoroRich Elite Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2012
    Messages:
    3,274
    Likes Received:
    1,601
    To be fair, the testing centre I use will give you your ticket as long as you don't ride the bike in on fire :D

    Illegal exhaust, illegal numberplate. Not a problem. He was just arsing about with me.
     
  4. ColinBR

    ColinBR God Like

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2011
    Messages:
    6,442
    Likes Received:
    3,236
    Yup this is true.
    If you have the seat you should have the pegs fitted lol.

    Same idea as having lights fitted. They need to work ;)
     
    • Like Like x 1
  5. martinowen

    martinowen Moderator
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 29, 2012
    Messages:
    9,907
    Likes Received:
    3,680
    My car failed its mot yesterday for this!


    [​IMG]
     
  6. glynn

    glynn Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2013
    Messages:
    603
    Likes Received:
    158
    Not enough space between the numbers and letters?
     
  7. glynn

    glynn Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2013
    Messages:
    603
    Likes Received:
    158
    Or the fog light? Is this a guessing game? :)
     
  8. thefirebloke

    thefirebloke Elite Member

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2012
    Messages:
    1,911
    Likes Received:
    1,559
    Think the spacing is wrong and not displaying suppliers name and postcode.
     
  9. BoroRich

    BoroRich Elite Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2012
    Messages:
    3,274
    Likes Received:
    1,601
    Now THAT's bloody pedantic :eek:
     
  10. thefirebloke

    thefirebloke Elite Member

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2012
    Messages:
    1,911
    Likes Received:
    1,559
    Not my rules!! :rolleyes:
     
  11. BoroRich

    BoroRich Elite Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2012
    Messages:
    3,274
    Likes Received:
    1,601
    Please tell me the tester didn't actually say that :D
     
  12. thefirebloke

    thefirebloke Elite Member

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2012
    Messages:
    1,911
    Likes Received:
    1,559
    Nearly failed my bike on it last year, only 'cos I knew them quite well that they let it through!
     
  13. BoroRich

    BoroRich Elite Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2012
    Messages:
    3,274
    Likes Received:
    1,601
    I seem to get lucky with my bike and car. I can't even remember the last time I had anything that failed.
     
  14. thefirebloke

    thefirebloke Elite Member

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2012
    Messages:
    1,911
    Likes Received:
    1,559
    They didn't even mention the fact that I'd cut the plate down, just that it didn't have the suppliers name on it!
     
  15. Barstewardsquad

    Barstewardsquad God Like

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2012
    Messages:
    8,300
    Likes Received:
    3,609
    plus no BS number.
     
  16. scooby

    scooby Elite Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2012
    Messages:
    3,527
    Likes Received:
    1,493

    not quite,if a bike has lights fitted they have to work or be taped over,theres no such thing as a "daytime" MOT.

    mine should have failed last yr for not having a split pin through the rear axle bolt!!!! (luckily the chaps are very helpful and put one on for me)
     
  17. martinowen

    martinowen Moderator
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 29, 2012
    Messages:
    9,907
    Likes Received:
    3,680
    Yep no double space should be M66 TNS, never had an issue in all the time I have had the plate w@nkers!
    I just velcro'd the new ones over the top and they now put an advisory "2nd number plate stuck over original" front and rear
     
    #17 martinowen, Feb 14, 2014
    Last edited: Feb 14, 2014
  18. Kevin1

    Kevin1 Elite Member

    Joined:
    May 30, 2012
    Messages:
    2,492
    Likes Received:
    1,120
    I think MOTs should stick with the safety issues and leave the technical legality out of it. I can understand the foot pegs thing. Martin, what do you think of the new shape CR-V?
     
  19. martinowen

    martinowen Moderator
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 29, 2012
    Messages:
    9,907
    Likes Received:
    3,680
    I'm not as keen on the new shape, like the shape of this one but wish I kept my Audi for build quality tbh
     
  20. Andy

    Andy Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2013
    Messages:
    773
    Likes Received:
    378
    In defence of the MOT tester, yes I agree some are down right awkward and are only looking for a reason to fail your vehicle maybe to get extra work through the workshop extra, but there is a reason why they are now probably stricter these days which you may or may not know.

    A fair few years ago now when they moved onto a electronic database where the tester has to log on to vosa with your vehicle details while he is doing the mot, vosa are actually recording the time spent on your vehicle.

    If they do not stay logged onto your vehicle for the correct amount of time (ie) finish early this flags up with vosa, also they randomly book dummy cars for them to test under false customer names and wait while the vehicle is tested, now they know which items are failable under the test and if the tester fails to spot these items or even advises something that is incorrect the investigation process starts.

    The normal outcome is vosa issues penalty points not only to the tester but also to the testing station, I can't remember the exact total of points your limit is but once reached they take away the testers licence and they can also take away the testing stations licence.

    You can even start investigations off simply by passing or failing to many vehicles, since every testing station is linked to the database they take a average of a pass and fail rate and if you don't fall in this area you get investigated
     
    • Like Like x 5

Share This Page