You may be interested in this.

Discussion in 'General 1000RR Discussion' started by Si., Jun 25, 2012.

  1. Si.

    Si. God Like

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    4,852
    Likes Received:
    3,343
    [​IMG]



    [​IMG]


    [​IMG]


    Just confirms about the low and mid of the panigale I tested...

    Good result or the blade.
     
    #1 Si., Jun 25, 2012
    • Like Like x 5
  2. BLAGGERS

    BLAGGERS Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2012
    Messages:
    1,852
    Likes Received:
    620
    Lol....mv =shite. Like I always knew.....cant wait to show my mate this. Had a dabble on his f4 and told him it was crap. Proper pissed him off.
     
    #2 BLAGGERS, Jun 25, 2012
  3. 1000rr73

    1000rr73 Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2012
    Messages:
    1,392
    Likes Received:
    391
    Wow, top result for the blade. Happy days, and just confirms what we all knew anyway eh?
     
    #3 1000rr73, Jun 26, 2012
  4. CastrolCraig

    CastrolCraig Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2011
    Messages:
    1,745
    Likes Received:
    488
    Most of the figures are about right, but the GSXR 1000 figure is way OTT, that's either a Suzuki press special or was run under different conditions. Also strange to see the panicearly get ten points for lightness when it weighs 3kg more than the blade.

    It's all as I said though, the blade is king.
     
    #4 CastrolCraig, Jun 26, 2012
  5. fez.57

    fez.57 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2011
    Messages:
    3,115
    Likes Received:
    876
    Whats the world coming to when even the yanks can get something right
     
    #5 fez.57, Jun 26, 2012
    • Like Like x 2
  6. Jimbo Vills

    Jimbo Vills God Like

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2011
    Messages:
    9,877
    Likes Received:
    6,654
    Struggling to believe some of these results, there is no way the BMW us that far down on power, would believe it's low on torque and power low down but right the way through like that?

    148bhp on an r1? Hmm

    And on the flip side how can the blade spank all the other in line 4's on torque (which I thought gave you grunt) and have such a smooth power curve yet they mark the engine lower than the others?

    Perhaps I'm just not understanding it right? Would the figures be diff as they are US bikes?

    Interesting find though Si
     
    #6 Jimbo Vills, Jun 26, 2012
  7. Remal

    Remal It's ME
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2011
    Messages:
    14,565
    Likes Received:
    3,679
    Well glad other dyno's suggest 160 RW BHP is acceptable for the blade :)

    cracking result
     
    #7 Remal, Jun 26, 2012
  8. samuk

    samuk Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2011
    Messages:
    1,249
    Likes Received:
    106
    I thought R1's were quicker then the blade...?

    At least that what the guy was going on about at the bike shop where i bought my new blade from..
     
    #8 samuk, Jun 26, 2012
  9. bladebhoy

    bladebhoy Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2011
    Messages:
    430
    Likes Received:
    104
    eye opening results.
     
    #9 bladebhoy, Jun 26, 2012
  10. Freedom of choice

    Freedom of choice Elite Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2011
    Messages:
    3,781
    Likes Received:
    1,790
    If I could understand the graph it would be great, loved the crayon colours though, especially the red one.
     
    #10 Freedom of choice, Jun 26, 2012
    • Like Like x 2

Share This Page